Chesapeake Quarterly Volume 7, Number 1: Bay's Labor Lost
2008
7
Table of Contents
Subscribe
Download pdf

Bay's Labor Lost

By Jack Greer

Seafood processors now look to foreign seasonal workers to help fill the shrinking ranks of local oyster shuckers and crab pickers.

For workers from places like Mexico, where pay scales are low, traveling to the U.S. for part of the year to work in the seafood business is not a bad deal. They can make better money and then bring that money home.

worked shucking oysters at Harris Seafood, photograph by Skip Brown

A win-win situation — except that the guest worker program has run into the controversy that surrounds U.S immigration policy.

The U.S. guest worker program falls under what's called the H-2B Work Visa. The U.S. Immigration Service created that visa mainly for non-agricultural jobs, in which U.S. workers are in short supply. It allows workers to come to the United States temporarily — and legally. One drawback: the program caps H-2B Visas at 66,000 nationwide each year.

While oyster plants can apply for workers at the beginning of the federal fiscal year, crab pickers are not so lucky. By the time the crab industry gets going in late spring and summer, other businesses have already scooped up most of the visas.

Crab processors like Jack Brooks, of J.M. Clayton Seafood in Cambridge, Maryland and Kevin Wade of J&W Seafood in Deltaville, Virginia took the issue to Congress. They found a sympathetic ear in Maryland Senator Barbara Mikulski and Virginia Senator John Warner. With their backing, Congress passed new rules that stagger the application allotment. Now one begins October 1 and the second April 1, so all the visas won't vanish at the start.

That helped, but the seafood processors still struggle, since applications quickly reach caps for both allotments.

Brooks and his colleagues went back to Congress. They argued that returning guest workers in good standing should be exempted from the cap. With the support of Senators Mikulski and Warner they won that argument, and language attached to a defense bill granted the exemption.

This meant that workers who'd mastered crab picking and oyster shucking — and who had proven themselves reliable — could return. It was a breakthrough for the processors and allowed them to build a workforce they could begin to depend on.

But this year that annual exemption failed to pass in the U.S. House of Representatives, and now processors once again find themselves facing the national cap.

The loss of the exemption came as a shock. According to Brooks, all of this year's visas for both the October 1 and April 1 start dates were taken well before the deadlines. Many processors, he says, including those in North Carolina and Virginia, got few guest workers — or none at all.

Why did the policy change? According to Brooks and Wade, the guest worker program has gotten tangled with the larger debate over immigration. Until the issue over illegal immigrants is settled, they say, political pressure hampers any expansion of the guest worker program.

This strikes Wade as unfair. "This isn't an immigration" issue," he says. "They [the guest workers] don't want to stay here."

Resource economist Doug Lipton at the University of Maryland agrees that the guest worker issue is a major one for the industry. He says that most of Maryland's crabmeat, worth some $20-35 million a year, is picked in traditional plants. Nearly 80 percent of Maryland's 15 to 20 crab plants rely on seasonal workers to pick that crabmeat, he says.

Lipton has also reached a remarkable conclusion. "We've calculated that for every seasonal worker in the seafood industry, 2.5 jobs are created in the state of Maryland," he says. According to Lipton, these guest workers are not taking American jobs. They are creating them.

Chesapeake Quarterly : Volume 25 Number 1 : Life on the Susquehanna Flats

Life on the Susquehanna Flats

June 2026 • Volume 25 Number 1

The Shallows That Shape the Chesapeake

The Susquehanna Flats are one of the Chesapeake’s most remarkable places. Home to the Bay’s largest expanse of submerged grasses, this vital habitat supports wildlife, water quality, and generations of waterfowl hunters. But when Tropical Storm Agnes swept through the watershed in the 1970s, the grass bed virtually disappeared. This story traces decades of loss and recovery on the Susquehanna Flats and their enduring value to the people and wildlife of the region.

The Dam Question

The Conowingo Dam lies 10 miles up the Susquehanna River from the Chesapeake Bay. Behind the dam, a 9,000-acre reservoir has been steadily filling with sediments, which flow over the dam and into the Bay during heavy storms and floods.  Researchers are studying the dam’s impact on the Chesapeake Bay, as well as the role of the Susquehanna Flats in filtering these flows.

 

Ribbons of Silver, Nets of Blue

Until the mid-1900s, fishermen in the Susquehanna Flats area hauled in immense catches of native river herring, shad, and striped bass. Today, the commercial harvest is dominated by an invasive species, the blue catfish. Explore the storied history of commercial fisheries in the upper Bay.

 

Fishing the Flats

Fishing enthusiasts flock to the Susquehanna Flats to pursue a range of species from striped bass to snakehead. The Flats play host to year-round fishing and hundreds of tournaments. “It’s about more than catching fish,” says one angler.

 
Cover photo by Dave Harp
Cover photo by Dave Harp

In This Issue

Related Links

Maryland Sea Grant
[Maryland Sea Grant] Maryland Sea Grant NOAA
Stay Connected
 
Chesapeake Quarterly is published by Maryland Sea Grant | Privacy Policy | © 2026 Maryland Sea Grant